Sunday, May 16, 2021

Oregon Lawmakers Vote to Give 'Energy Burdened' Households a Break on Utility Bills (Portland Business Journal, OR)

Oregon lawmakers have sent a bill to the governor that’s intended to help low-income Oregonians pay their energy bills.

The Energy Affordability Act, as supporters have dubbed it, allows regulators to consider lower electricity and natural gas rates or bill credits for “energy burdened” low-income households.

The Senate on Thursday voted 18-11 to pass the bill. All Democrats except Betsy Johnson supported it; all voting Republicans except Tim Knopp voted no. The House passed the bill, 36-20, in March.

The bill represents a change to longstanding policy that the Public Utility Commission treat all customers within a class — residential, commercial or industrial — the same as it establishes rates for the investor-owned utilities Portland General Electric, Pacific Power and NW Natural.

The utilities, various activists groups and the ratepayer advocate Citizens’ Utility Board all supported the bill.

Backers argued that state weatherization and bill assistance programs still left thousands of people facing a home energy affordability gap.

Six percent of household income is widely seen as the threshold for a manageable energy burden, with 10% considered “severely energy burdened.” As a percentage of low-income households, Eastern Oregon counties have the most energy burdened households in the state.

Smaller bills for low-income households could leave other ratepayers filling the revenue gap, but one study found such programs can result in higher collected revenue.

The Oregon legislation also opens up low-income and environmental-justice advocacy groups for “intervenor funds” from the PUC, totaling up to $500,000 annually. These are ratepayer-financed grants for nonprofits that represent broad groups or classes of customers.

That’s the aspect of the bill that generated the most disagreement.

Some Republicans pushed for a version of the bill that would have made representatives of small commercial customers also eligible for intervenor funds, while dropping representatives of “environmental justice communities.”

That version was defeated on a largely party-line 19-10 vote on Thursday.